References Campbell, C. & Tytler, R. (in press). Students’ science conceptions, and views of learning. In G. Venville & V. Dawson (Eds), The art of primary science teaching. (Perth: Allen and Unwin) Hellden, G. (2005). Exploring understandings and responses to science: A program of longitudinal studies. Research in Science Education, 35(1), 99-122. Klein, P. (2006). The challenges of scientific literacy: From the viewpoint of second generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education (special issue on science literacy), 28(2-3), 143-178. Rogoff, B. & Lave, J. (eds) (1984). Everyday Cognition: Its Development in Social Context, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Scott, P. (1998). Teacher Talk and Meaning Making in Science Classrooms: A Vygotskian Analysis and Review. Studies in Science Education, Vol.32, pp45-80 Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the danger of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, Vol.27 (2), 4-13. Solomon, J. (1983). Learning about energy: How pupils think in two domains. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 49–59. Tytler, R. & Peterson, S. (2001). Deconstructing learning in science: Young children’s responses to a classroom sequence on evaporation. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 339-355. Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2004). Young children learning about evaporation: Insights from a longitudinal study. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(1), 111-126. Tytler, R., Peterson, S., & Radford, T. (2004). Living things and environments. In K. Skamp (Ed.), Teaching primary science constructively (2nd ed., pp. 247-294). Melbourne, Australia: Thomson Tytler, R. & Peterson, S. (2005). A longitudinal study of children's developing knowledge and reasoning in science. Research in Science Education (Special edition on longitudinal studies of student learning in science), 35(1), 63-98. Tytler, R., Peterson, S. & Prain, V. (2006). Picturing evaporation: Learning science literacy through a particle representation. Teaching Science, the Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 52(1), 12-17. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and Language, Cambridge: MIT Press.
The culture of central Texas may lend itself more to stone, brick, stucco, and other more rough and arid building materials, but the truth is San Antonio is a great locale for a log home. First, the dry climate makes log home construction considerably easier and prevents fewer obstacles and time delays, http://kran.site90.com which, in turn, can also reduce the cost. Moreover, the San Antonio real estate and housing market make the Alamo City a great place to build a log home. While the rest of the nation is experiencing a housing slump, the San Antonio market remains relatively strong as people continue to move to the area, stabilizing and increasing property values.